Untested in dogs

Rapamycin (sirolimus) for healthy aging

Sold as Rapamune

The most credible candidate for a genuine anti-aging drug in dogs, currently being tested in a real randomized trial that has not yet reported results. There is no honest basis today for giving it to a healthy dog outside that trial.

Why this grade

The definitive trial is running but has not reported. TRIAD is a properly randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial with lifespan and healthspan endpoints, but as of mid-2026 it has enrolled roughly 180 of a target 580 dogs and only a few have completed the full three-year period. Published TRIAD output so far is baseline cohort description, not outcome data. Tier U means untested, not disproven. This is the most scientifically serious longevity effort in dogs, and it deserves patience rather than extrapolation.

What the trials show

TRIAD, the Test of Rapamycin in Aging Dogs, is run through the Dog Aging Project and described by its investigators as the first rigorous test of a pharmacologic intervention against biological aging with lifespan and healthspan endpoints performed outside the laboratory in any species. Eligible normally aging dogs at least seven years old receive oral rapamycin or placebo for one year, followed by a two-year observation period. As of 2026, enrollment stands at over 180 dogs against a target of 580, with a handful having completed the full three years. The trial survived a funding crisis via a $7 million grant. The published TRIAD work to date covers cognitive assessment methodology and baseline cohort characteristics rather than any efficacy result. One example: 35 dogs examined for inclusion, with a median age of 9.2 years and median weight of 27.7 kg. Anyone citing rapamycin as proven in dogs is citing mouse data or hope.

Harms and cautions

Not characterized for long-term use in healthy dogs, which is precisely what the trial exists to determine. Rapamycin is an immunosuppressant at transplant doses; the geroscience hypothesis relies on intermittent low doses behaving differently, and that assumption is being tested, not established. Plausible concerns include impaired wound healing, metabolic effects, and infection susceptibility. A healthy dog given this off-label is absorbing unquantified risk for an unquantified benefit.

Practical detail

Route
Oral, intermittent dosing in the trial protocol
Typical course
TRIAD protocol: 1 year of dosing, 2 years of observation
Monitoring
Within the trial, extensive. Outside it, no established monitoring protocol exists.
Cost
varies

Regulatory status

United States
Not approved for any use in dogs. Human formulations are sometimes prescribed off-label, which is legal but places the evidentiary burden entirely on the prescribing veterinarian.
Note
Off-label prescribing outside a trial means accepting an unknown risk-benefit ratio in exchange for an unproven benefit.

Questions worth asking your vet

  • Is my dog eligible for TRIAD, and is there an enrolling site near me?
  • If you would prescribe this off-label, what monitoring plan and stopping rules would you use, given no protocol has been validated?
  • What would we be giving up by waiting for the trial to report?

The evidence, one study at a time

Dog Aging Project. Test of Rapamycin in Aging Dogs (TRIAD). Multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial, ongoing.

ongoing trial 2026

The trial that will actually answer this question. Until it reports, the honest answer about rapamycin in dogs is that nobody knows.

Design
Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre
Dogs analyzed
180
Blinding
double-blind
Control
Placebo
Duration
1 year of treatment plus 2 years of observation
Population
Healthy, middle-aged, medium-to-large companion dogs aged 7+, target enrollment 580
Primary outcome
Lifespan and healthspan
Result
Enrollment ongoing; no efficacy results published as of mid-2026.
Funding
National Institute on Aging and philanthropic support, including a $7 million rescue grant

Read the source

Canine cognition assessments in the Test of Rapamycin in Aging Dogs (TRIAD). 2024.

observational 2024

Methodological groundwork, explicitly not an efficacy result. Included so the distinction is visible rather than blurred.

Design
Baseline cohort characterization
Dogs analyzed
35
Blinding
not-applicable
Population
Dogs screened for TRIAD inclusion; median age 9.2 years, median weight 27.7 kg
Result
Median CADES score 1.0, median Sustained Gaze score 9.0 at baseline.

Read the source

$7M grant rescues dog study investigating rapamycin for canine aging. American Veterinary Medical Association, 2025.

regulatory 2025

Context on why results are slower than the surrounding enthusiasm suggests.

Design
News report on trial funding
Blinding
not-applicable
Result
Funding secured to continue TRIAD after a shortfall threatened it.

Read the source

See also